Fear of change: A stalling force in Australian politics

Where are the courageous leaders who can navigate the political landscape to bring about much-needed positive social and political change?

Australia, a nation supposedly known for its free and adventurous spirit, its boldness and bravery in the face of challenges, presents a perplexing paradox when it comes to political change. While the rhetoric and caricature of the “land down under” extols the virtues of a dynamic and fearless society, its political landscape often appears as the opposite. Why is this lack of courage so prevalent in Australian politics, especially when the inertia it creates can be so easily exploited by deeply conservative forces?

The fear of change in Australia manifests in various arenas, from referendums to debates on industrial relations, and is often characterised by a pervasive belief pushed forward by conservatives that any alteration to the status quo will result in catastrophic consequences. Despite the recurrent nature of these alarmist campaigns, the doomsday scenarios have never materialised. Yet, this fear-mongering cycle continues, aided and abetted by a compliant mainstream media, perpetuating political gridlock and stifling progress.

One of the enigmatic aspects of Australian politics is the stark contrast between the cliché of nation’s adventurous spirit and its reluctance to embrace change, particularly on issues related to Indigenous rights and constitutional reform. Understanding the origins of this fear requires examining historical, cultural, and political factors that have shaped the nation’s psyche.

The roots of this fear of change could be traced back to the formation of Australia’s Constitution in 1901, or even further beyond, with the fear of the outsiders ever since invasion of the continent in 1788. The ease with which frenzies can be whipped up around constitutional amendments points to a fundamental issue in the nation’s foundational document. The Republic referendum of 1999 serves as an illustrative case, where the fear of change overshadowed any rational discourse, ultimately leading to the proposal’s defeat. Could it be that this fear is grounded in a broader anxiety about Australia itself, a continent that was stolen and now faces the potential of being reclaimed by First Nations people, even if it is on a very miniscule level?